Do you shop online? Get ready to pay a little more. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a state can make retailers charge and submit taxes on goods they sell into that state, even if they do not have a physical presence in it. In Wayfair v. South Dakota, the Court concluded that the “sales tax nexus” previously articulated by the Court in Quill v. North Dakota is “unsound and incorrect.” That ruling held that a state cannot require an out-of-state seller with no physical presence in the state to collect and remit sales taxes on goods the seller ships to consumers there.

What it means for out-of-state retailers is that sales tax nexus is no longer solely based on a physical presence standard. Out-of-state sellers that meet minimum standards can be required to charge, collect and remit sales tax. Each state sets its own standards. In South Dakota, the minimum standards are $100,000 in sales or more than 200 transactions over a 12-month period.

The winners are local brick and mortar businesses, which will be able to compete pricewise with online retail giants. States and municipalities stand to gain billions of dollars in annual revenue. The losers are small online retailers who could be devastated by new compliance costs.

HBK's Tax Advisory Group (TAG) will provide updates about the decision as they become available.

Shane M. Finn directs HBK CPAs & Consultants State and Local Tax (“SALT”) Practice. He is a member of the firm’s Tax Advisory Group based in the Mid-Atlantic Region. HBK CPAs & Consultants has offices in five Florida cities, including Sarasota.